6/10/2023 0 Comments Roland fp 60xThis means that the pianos can play up to 256 samples at the same time. To start, both pianos come with 256-note polyphony. I couldn’t pick a winner as both instruments offered a wide range of features that are all very useful. Piano FeaturesĪnother area wherein these pianos were tied was the piano features. So, regardless of which piano you choose, you can expect it to provide you with the variety you need for various musical styles. Even the most experienced pianists won’t use all 600 tones regularly, so the 358 from the Roland is more than decent. ![]() While this is significantly smaller than the Yamaha, it offers the same functionality. The Roland has a smaller library with only 358 tones. However, not all of these tones come from the CFX Sound Engine so you can expect a slight dip in quality, especially with the drums, strings, synth, and SFX sound banks. The Yamaha DGX-670 has a larger sound library with over 630 tones. However, take note that the Roland is more expensive than the Yamaha, so you’re paying more for more or less the same tone quality.īoth of these pianos feature hundreds of tones. You still get realistic piano tones with this instrument. This is the brand’s equivalent to Yamaha’s CFX sound engine and performs about the same. ![]() The Roland, on the other hand, uses the SuperNatural Piano Sound. In fact, out of a good system, this piano is about as close as you’ll get to a real acoustic sound at this price point. The result is a very bright and balanced tone that’s very close to a real piano. This is an engine packed with top-quality samples recorded from Yamaha CF Grand Pianos. The Yamaha DGX-670 uses the CFX sound engine. On top of that, they both have wide sound libraries, giving you many options for different musical styles.ĭGX-670 comes with advanced Automatic Accompaniment Styles Since these are both premium options from the brands, you can expect them to have great sound quality. And as expected, the Yamaha and Roland both offered very realistic and high-quality piano tones. The next consideration I had was the tone. So, if you want the slight nuance you can get with acoustic pianos, the Roland FP-60x does a much better job than the Yamaha DGX-670.Īnd because of this, the Roland FP-60x won the whole comparison, as these two pianos were tied for every other comparison point. The Yamaha only features 5 types of touch sensitivity, while the Roland features over 100. ![]() This hammer action also features heavier keys on the bass side, and it feels very close to an acoustic piano.īut the reason the Roland came out on top was the adjustable key sensitivity. The Roland FP-60x, on the other hand, has the PHA-4 system, which is one of Roland’s best options. On top of that, the keys have a slight texture to them, which feels much closer to an acoustic piano than glossy keys. In fact, you can find this hammer action system on many Yamaha digital pianos because it’s affordable but can compete with any other premium option on the market. This is the most basic progressive hammer action system on Yamaha pianos, but it’s one of the best. The DGX-670 comes with the Graded Hammer Standard of Yamaha. ![]() Roland FP60x feels more realistic than the Yamaha DGX-670īefore anything, let’s talk about the hammer action because both of these pianos feature great hammer action systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |